Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
GankYou wrote: And where does PLEX originate from? Arkonor trees? ARKONOR TREES! YOU ARE MY HERO! *goes away again to stare at Space fishies *
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 16:13:34
|
162. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Theo Sotken wrote: Since plex is the only thing that consistantly goes up in price I suspect that the 'older players' you mention are sitting on quite a lot of plexes bought at quite a lower price. So in reality it will cost those players less ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 14:07:32
|
163. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: As several people have said, the reason is obvious - CCP want to sell ship logos back to us, and for reasons that should be obvious, they cannot sell something to the people who already own it, they have to own the logo ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 12:41:04
|
164. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Something else I noticed: I might be mistaken, but the "Ardishapur" Skin basically has the same colours as Viziam in the preview and Viziam is for Tech2 ships. Is this intended or accidental? In the end, this should be a little reminder how ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 12:03:31
|
165. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Snoop Dong wrote: http://i.imgur.com/pvHiYxy.jpg I'm curious where you got that image c: is there any source for the publication? I'd like to know more about it's origins. Sorry if it is somewhere on the forum already, I usually only look at...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 10:08:10
|
166. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Terminus wrote: The old Scorpion Ishukone Watch had the same stats as the base version. The Scorpion got rebalanced but the Scorpion Ishukone Watch was forgotten in that process and never got the new stats. Oh that makes sense now... than...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.23 02:50:11
|
167. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ned Thomas wrote: Anyway, the answer is that the special edition Miasmos-es have different base stats than the regular Miasmos, and they will remain separate ships because of this. This is weird because the Scorpion Ishukone Watch version has ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.22 23:10:44
|
168. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
People complaining about Scorpion Ishukone Watch wrote: A limited ship that is only meant for station spinning will actually see the light of the stars! THIS CANNOT HAPPEN! The price will so drop because of this! Oh really? OH REALLY?! ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.22 17:08:01
|
169. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Questions first: I only saw a CSM "confirm" that items which are tagged with "market" will not be re-seeded and only use the current supply in the game. There was no mention of that in the devblog, and no mention of that from a dev here, and no m...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.22 15:09:20
|
170. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship Customization: Time to Show Some SKIN - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I still wonder if it would not have been better to keep the skins around their old price but instead of making them unlock on account, they are like modules which you slot into a new slot on the ship. You could have exchanged the skins on that com...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.21 23:58:54
|
171. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thanks c: ... but colour me totally flabbergasted by the ambiguity. The least you could think is them saying WHAT EXACTLY was wrong with the image.
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.21 02:22:12
|
172. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Maybe it is buried in all that reddit mess which I'm not willing to dig through, and it hasn't been mentioned in this topic... but... Is it allowed for the person receiving the rejection to disclose the reason with us? Because: Devblog wrote: ...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.20 22:10:39
|
173. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Well! Let us go to a more constructive part of the topic again c: There are still a few things I'd like to have confirmed: Let's say we send in a logo, and it gets approved. Then we send in another logo to see if certain changes are allowed, and...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.20 12:49:44
|
174. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: Got a screenshot of the rejected logo? *stares blankly* *points to the same page of this topic, a few entries earlier* I don't even... Darin Raltin wrote: Well, its begun. A five year old logo has been denied http://i.im...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.19 19:06:01
|
175. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nyctef wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: Things that you don't expect often happen, and assumption is the mother of all mistakes. Why even have guidelines if you're not going to follow them? Let me allow to quote you something from the other...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.18 13:27:09
|
176. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Well okay, maybe not "people". That is a bad generalization. Maybe... "those people"... would be more inclusive. I guess? Not wanting to insult the three people including myself who proved a single person how easy it was to get the required info c:
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.16 20:08:56
|
177. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Those two beat me to it c: I was about to say... first think I did was clicking "public relations" and then I scrolled down to the bottom. And wooosh! informatiooooooon! I mean, seriously, have people become so lazy? :c
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.16 18:19:47
|
178. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
In the end, with the copyright problem, I just want to know if the CAStabouts logo is allowed to use the CAS corporation base logo c: Well you pretty much just proved how and why a two-image submission would be better c: A static 128x128 high fid...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.16 13:01:39
|
179. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thanks Falcon for replying c: *hugs* And it's great to see the numbers have been dropped down to 150 again c: I do have some follow up questions though, if you don't mind; CCP Falcon wrote: Capsuleer organizations are not NPC organization, and...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.16 11:51:57
|
180. Sticky:Dev blog: Alliance Logos & You - Submissions Re-Opened! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: Do people in here actually request licenses from tge designers when getting logos done and do designers in here actually write licenses on usage to clients? If for example a logo is created as part of a working contract then so...
- by Natya Mebelle - at 2015.04.16 09:50:16
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |